Monday, November 22, 2021

Board Dead Set on Repealing Citizen Initiative

On December 7, the Board of Sarasota County Commissioners will designate a special election to repeal Single Member District voting.


They're back . . . Sarasota’s highest elected officials intend to undo a Charter Amendment that the electorate approved just three years ago.


What’s going on? Why does the Board want us to re-vote on an amendment we approved by 60 percent across all five districts in 2018?


Fueled by hollow rhetoric, reasons offered by the Commissioners have been shifting:


We the People were “confused” when we voted for Single Member Districts, according to Commissioner Al Maio.


After the public explained -- in person on three occasions and through a professional County poll -- that it was not confused, Commissioner Mike Moran offered another story: “Sly Democrat operatives” have fooled a gullible electorate into voting for Single Member Districts, he said.


When the non-partisan Citizens for District Power noted that the 2018 vote passed by a strong majority in all five Republican districts, Moran switched to “sly political operatives,” or just “sly operatives.”


Instead of describing voters as confused or hoodwinked, Commissioner Nancy Detert said, "I've never liked Single Member Districts, but I'm getting tired of trying to save people from themselves.”


Board of Sarasota County


Why are our elected Commissioners bound and determined to reverse this citizens’ amendment to Sarasota County’s Home Rule Charter?


In a word, fear.

The Board has a critical task: to evaluate and approve large-scale developer plans for housing projects, commercial centers, apartments and roads. What can happen to their political careers if each Commissioner had to answer to citizens impacted by their rapid-fire blanket developer approvals in his or her district?


Take for example the highly controversial “mega-hotels” recently approved on Siesta Key.

Scale of proposed Siesta Key hotel

Residents from some 70 Siesta Key HOAs hired lawyers and professional planners, and came out in force, presenting strong, cogent arguments why these hotels would be disastrous to the local character of the barrier island. To no avail -- the Board approved both hotels that have come before it (two more are in the pipeline). Under Single Member Districts, the Board members would be answerable to their district voters on Siesta Key. In a re-election, they’d face intense public scrutiny of their voting record.

When these same politicians are elected by all the voters of the County, they can avoid addressing issues of concern in their District. They’ll drown the mailboxes of North Port, Northeast Sarasota or Englewood with their mailers, knowing full well that many voters in other districts neither know about nor care what the Board allows developers to do to Siesta Key.


In the current economic environment, Countywide voting allows candidates to ignore everything that urgently matters to residents of their district. In recent years, incumbents have refused to participate in public forums or debates, to hold town hall meetings, even to be interviewed by the press.


That allows politicians running for our Board, which dedicates a great deal of time to growth issues in an overheated developer frenzy, to evade the people who want to preserve our Siesta Key and oppose mega hotels, or who fight the transformation of vast ranchlands into suburban gated communities, or who worry about an intersection that can’t handle oversized developments -- like Siesta Promenade at Stickney Point and US 41.


Single Member District voting requires each Commissioner to face the people who feel their neighborhoods, roads and environment are imperiled by their Board votes. And SMD candidates can reach their district voters without needing developer dollars or Dark Money, while Countywide campaigns cost at least $100,000.


Over time, special interests have made it clear that to even hope for their support, you have to publicly demonstrate your pro-growth credentials -- by serving on the Planning Commission, for example. Planning “commissioners” are not elected, but are appointed by County Commissioners -- Maio, Moran and District 5 Commissioner Ron Cutsinger all are alumni of that self-fulfilling loop.


Sarasotans worked hard to adopt Single Member Districts from a shared sense that growth here has gotten out of hand. Those who remember Sarasota as a place of taste, charm, and intelligence do not need to be saved from themselves. Rather, they need a level of political accountability that could save Sarasota from its at-large-elected officials.


Come to the Board Hearing on December 7 to speak, or simply to pack the room. The latest Hearing information will be posted to the home page of the Citizens for District Power site.

The Board discussion described above took place on Nov. 16, 2021, beginning at the 2 hour, 50-minute mark.

Thursday, November 11, 2021

Council of Neighborhood Associations tells Board: Alternative 1-A is the least bad of a bad lot

After reviewing the analysis that follows by CCNA, the Sarasota City Coalition of Neighborhood Associations, of the proposed maps by which redistricting of the county would be established during the special meeting of November 15, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. under agenda item 1, 


For the Board to approve one of the three motions below:


  1. Adopt a resolution approving Goodrich 1 Map as the new Sarasota County District Boundaries map; or
  2. Adopt a resolution approving Goodrich 2 Map as the new Sarasota County District Boundaries map; or
  3. Adopt a resolution approving Alternative Map 1-A as the new Sarasota County District Boundaries map

if the commission is unwilling to have less discriminatory maps drafted — which still is feasible and is our preference rather than choosing from among the options listed — then, Alternative Map 1-A is the least objectionable choice as the new Sarasota County District Boundaries map

Therefore, if additional options are not drafted,
CONA supports only the adoption of Alternative Map 1-A. 

Please enter this message in its entirety, including its referenced charts and table, into the official record of the meeting as our public input and consider our suggestion for having less objectionable maps drawn before making a decision regarding the selection of a new map.

Sincerely, 

Kafi Benz

CCNA analysis of proposed maps:






City_of_Sarasota_Redistricting_Impacts20211107a


Exhibit 2: The map on the right illustrates the disenfranchisement of 20% of the city's black population under the "Goodrich 2" proposal.
Click here or the image for a larger view.
goodrich2BlackDisenfranchised20211102

Exhibit 3: The map on the right illustrates the disenfranchisement of 57,000 county residents under the "Goodrich 2" proposal.
Click here or the image for a larger view.
Goodrich_2_Total_Disenfranchised_20211107



See the table below for a list of all impacted neighborhoods under the "Goodrich 2" map.


Exhibit 4: Even the "Goodrich 1" proposal compromises the ability of 20,000 county residents ability to vote for their commissioner.
Click here or the image for a larger view.
Goodrich_1_Total_Disenfranchised_20211107

Exhibit 5: Of the three proposals under consideration "Alternative 1-A" impacts the fewest residents at 1,437. 
Click here or the image for a larger view.
Alt-1-A_Total_Disenfrachised_20211107
"Alternative 1-A" disenfranchises the fewest number of voters.
Each of the "Goodrich 2" and "Goodrich 1" proposals respectively
disenfranchises 57,000 and 20,000 residents.

Table:
City neighborhoods that will be disenfranchised - again - with the "Goodrich 2" map


Alta Vista Neighborhood Association, Inc.
Arlington Park Neighborhood Association
Avondale Residents Association, Inc.
Bay Point Park Neighborhood Association, Inc.
Bayou Oaks Neighborhood Association
Bird Key Improvement Association, Inc.
Broadway Promenade Condominium Association, Inc.
Central Cocoanut Neighborhood Association, Inc.
Cherokee Park Homeowners Association, Inc.
Downtown Sarasota Condo Association
Gillespie Park Neighborhood Association, Inc.
Golden Gate Point Association, Inc.
Granada Neighborhood Association, Inc.
Harbor Acres Community Association, Incorporated
Hudson Bayou Neighborhood Association, Inc.
Indian Beach-Sapphire Shores Neighborhood Association, Inc.
John Ringling Blvd. Association
Laurel Park, Inc.
Lido Key Residents Association, Inc.
Lido Shores Property Owners Association, Inc.
McClellan Park Homeowners Association, Inc.
Park East Community Association (partial)
Rosemary District Association
San Remo Estates Association, Inc.
Sarasota Housing Authority Residents Council (partial)
Shoreland Woods Neighborhood Association
South Poinsettia Park Neighborhood Association, Inc.
St. Armands Residents Association
Tahiti Park Neighborhood Association, Inc.

Thursday, October 28, 2021

Come out to Bobby Jones Day on Saturday, November 13

On Saturday November 13, Conserve Bobby Jones Now is hosting Bobby Jones Day, supported by The City of Sarasota, The Sarasota Audubon Society, The Conservation Foundation of the Gulf Coast, and other organizations. (More on Partner organizations TBA). Beginning at 8:00 AM, join us for an Audubon Society guided bird walk. 

If that is too early, arrive prior to opening remarks between 8:15 and 8:30 AM and then follow marked hiking trails to find local experts giving short informational sessions about topics such as wetlands restoration plans, golf plans, the watershed, the birds and wildlife, connectivity to the Legacy Trail, the conservation easement, and habitat on the precious land we call Bobby Jones Golf and Nature Trails. 

The event will conclude at 10:30 AM. Located at 1000 Circus Blvd, Bobby Jones Golf and Nature Trails remains open to hiking while plans for golf restoration and wetland and watershed improvements are underway, as well as discussions of the preservation of Bobby Jones via a conservation easement. 

For more info 941-650-7807 Or email clearlycreative@aol.com








Sunday, October 10, 2021

Ayech on Piney Point

September 22, 2021

RE: Piney Point

Good day

This email is on behalf of two organizations and my family.

The Environmental Confederation of Southwest Florida (ECOSWF) is an umbrella group composed of environmental organizations, historic preservation organizations and individuals.  Some of which are your constituent

ECOSWF has been involved in water use for the last 50 years.

ECOSWF has consistently opposed deep well injection.


Here are case studies:

  • For many years, Manatee County has had an Aquifer and Storage Recover (ASR) well near Manatee Reservoir.  The theory was excess water would be removed from the Reservoir and injected in the ground causing a “bubble” from which the injected water could be extracted for public supply.  We know the water retrieved from the ASR well was not the same water that was injected because the water quality was different.
  • The Peace River Regional Water Authority used deep well injection in their ASR program.  The result was the pyrites released arsenic into the area of injection because the water chemistry of surface water is not the same as ground water.  For years, the authority was not given permission to use the water from those wells for public supply.  Years of purging the well took place to remove reduce the arsenic levels to acceptable one.
  • The phosphate industry used to put “recharge” wells under their gypsum stacks.  The water would drain into the well and go into the aquifer.  The town of Mulberry actually heard the rumbling that accord as the acidic water ate away the limestone and bubbled up.  Tanker trucks of fuel oil were brought in and the fuel oil was dumped into the wells.  The result, when people on wells turned on their faucets, fuel oil came out.

There is also an argument espoused that says the injected water will not affect aquifers that are used by the public and agriculture.  The words FOR NOW should be inserted.

We used to have free flowing wells, but anthropogenic actions changed that.  So, we drilled our wells deeper.  With the existing growth in Florida, we DO NOT KNOW how deep we will eventually need to go.

The Southwest Florida Water Management District’s (SWFWMD) Southern Water Use Caution Area is declared because of saltwater moving into the coast from the Gulf and upconing of poorer mineralized water from the DEEPER AQUIFERS.

This shows movement of water inland and upward.

Although SWFWMD requires wells to be cased to the aquifer from which they are withdrawing, it is not enforced.  Both agriculture wells and the City of Sarasota’s Verna Wellfield are improperly constructed because they are not cased to the confining layer from which they withdraw.

The Miakka Community Club’s members rely solely on domestic wells now and into the future to meet their daily water needs.  There is a real potential for the movement of the injected water to contaminate the wells in the future.

My family relies on our domestic well.  I am on my third well because of the continued lowering of the water pressure/level.  Each well has had to go deeper and the water quality continues to decline with each new well and on a continuing daily basis.

THERE IS NO PROGRAM TO TEST DOMESTIC WELL WATER.  A domestic well only is tested for secondary drinking water standards and that is only when the well is drilled.

And it is important to remember, the existing rules and regulations state my well will not and cannot be impacted.  So much for the protection afforded by those regulations.

I am asking you on behalf of ECOSWF, Miakka Community Club and my family to NOT pursue deep injection.

Out of mind, out of sight is not a solution.  You are changing one problem for another.  One that will not easily be seen or detected.

Finally, I want to point out that in June of 2003, DEP was hoping to send water to the reclaimed water plants in Hillsborough and Manatee counties to the city of St. Petersburg and possibly to other phosphate plants that can use the water for continued fertilizer processing. (Herald Tribune, June 25, 2003).  What happened with that proposal?

Becky Ayech

ECOSWF President

Miakka Community Club President

Domestic well user.