Showing posts with label Sarasota Action Network. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sarasota Action Network. Show all posts

Saturday, February 21, 2015

Alternative Visions Forum: Hines, Thaxton, Zoller

Video clips from the "Alternative Visions of Sarasota" forum organized by the Better Government Association, and held at the new Gulf Gate Library on Feb. 21, 2015.

The panel included Sarasota County Commissioner Charles Hines, former CONA president Bill Zoller, and former Sarasota Commissioner Jon Thaxton.

Introductory remarks from each speaker below.



Commissioner Charles Hines




Former Commissioner Jon Thaxton



 Community Leader Bill Zoller








Thaxton answers question





Monday, February 16, 2015

The Green Necklace

While Sarasota County (FL) connives to install shooting ranges within Pineland Reserves, cities with something like forethought are devising urban farming business models. Check out this very cool piece out of Baltimore:

This sprawling six acre farm is carved out from the park, sits next to a school and looks more rural than the others due to ample open space and a mix of fields, an orchard and more hoop houses which here are called "high tunnels." A food truck of sorts gets dispatched from here as a mobile supermarket and brings
This fledgling urban "farm" is more like the urban gardening
that many imagine when they hear about urban food
 the products of this farm deep into the eastern food deserts. This non-profit organization, too, has a mission statement:
Real Food Farm works toward a just and sustainable food system by improving neighborhood access to healthy food, providing experience-based education, and developing an economically viable, environmentally responsible local agriculture sector.






Tuesday, February 10, 2015

Petition to Keep Guns out of Pinelands Reserve

Protect Sarasota's Pinelands Reserve!


We, the signatories, oppose the Sarasota County Commission decision to approve a shooting range on 43 acres of Pinelands Reserve conservation land. 
The Sarasota County Comprehensive Plan requires “recreational uses implemented on the Walton Tract [Pinelands Reserve]....shall be limited to activities which are ecologically benign, non-consumptive, and resource-based." 

A shooting range employing lead shot and clay pigeons will introduce hazardous substances found to be carginogenic and otherwise toxic. 

Antunes: Letter to Sarasota County on Proposed Shooting Range on Pinelands Reserve

Via Cathy Antunes' site, The Detail:


Dear Commissioners,

Good morning!  I may not be able to give public input during agenda item 28 today due to a prior commitment, so I am sending you my written comments.

I urge you to reject the petition to approve Pinelands Reserve conservation land for a shooting range.  The petition ought to be rejected for the following reasons:

According to the Comprehensive Plan (Recreational and Open Space Chapter 1),  “recreational uses implemented on the Walton Tract [Pinelands Reserve] and T. Mabry Carlton, Jr.Memorial Reserve shall be limited to activties which are ecologically benign, non-consumptive, and resource-based."  This wording is also found in the Sarasota County Land Management Master plan and the Pinelands Reserve management plan.  A shooting range on the Pinelands Reserve violates these requirements.

  • A shooting range employing lead shot and clay pigeons will introduce hazardous substances found to be carginogenic and otherwise toxic.  I refer you to the references provided in the correspondence background materials for this agenda item.  Such harmful substance are the antithesis of ecologically benign.                                                                                                                                                                   
  • A shooting range employing lead shot and clay pigeons will generate significant noise which will discourage or eliminate nesting birds.  Not ecologically benign.
  • Clearing substantial acres of conservation land for a shooting range is neither resource-based, non-consumptive, nor ecologically benign.
  • The submitted permit fails to include best planned management practices addressing the planned use of lead shot & clay pigeons.  The permit itself doesn’t comply with County requirements for approving land use changes. 
  • The submitted application fails to include Disclosure of Ownership form.  Again the permit itself doesn’t comply with County requirements for approving land use changes. 
  • The submitted application fails to include an Owner Affidavit form.  Again the permit itself doesn’t comply with County requirements for approving land use changes. 
  • The submitted application fails to include a Billable Fee Pay Agreement.  Again the permit itself doesn’t comply with County requirements for approving land use changes. 
  • The submitted application fails to indicate that the soil (pineda soil) is subject to flooding/standing water.
  • This land use change will effectively privatize public land.

It has been reported that the neighborhood workshop held on this issue failed to notify residents that the lands in question are conservation lands, specifically Pinelands Reserve.  Today’s agenda item description also fails to identify the land in question as Pinelands Reserve conservation land.  This is a substantive omission.  Failure to communicate clearly on this subject with the public calls into question the validity of the outcomes of the ensuing meetings.  

Is it true that County employees have refrained from bringing these and perhaps other concerns forward regarding the shooting range application for fear of reprisal?  Reports of County employee intimidation are reminiscent of the reported “marked for death” County culture which existed under Jim Ley.  Will you be initiating an ethic investigation into these concerns? (I refer you to the background correspondence document for this agenda item).

My input is informed by my service on the board of the Council of Neighborhood Associations since 2011, during which time I have studied the Comprehensive Plan and given input to the County Commission regarding land use issues.  I have written various columns and guest columns addressing land use issues, as well as blog entries on my website, www.thedetail.net.  Thank you for your consideration.


Sincerely,

Cathy Antunes

Saturday, December 13, 2014

Three ranches added to Florida Forever

via Herald-Tribune 

3 ranches added to Florida conservation list


More than 5,770 acres of undeveloped land in North Port on McCall Ranch went up for auction on Feb. 13, 2014.
HERALD-TRIBUNE ARCHIVE / ELAINE LITHERLAND
Published: Friday, December 12, 2014 at 2:11 p.m.
Last Modified: Friday, December 12, 2014 at 2:11 p.m.
Three ranches in Sarasota and Manatee counties were added to the state's conservation priority list on Friday.
Two border Myakka River State Park and would help buffer the popular attraction.
The third — the Orange Hammock Ranch, formerly known as McCall Ranch — is in North Port, and its inclusion on the state's Florida Forever conservation list has been questioned by city officials who want to see the property developed.
North Port leaders persuaded the Sarasota County Commission not to endorse the Orange Hammock portion of the Florida Forever application this week. The controversy did not stop state officials from moving ahead with the conservation deal, but it still has a long way to go.
Being added to the Florida Forever list does not guarantee the ranches will be protected from development, but it clears the way for more detailed talks with the landowners to see if a deal is possible.
“It's definitely a great first step,” said Debi Osborne, who helped put together the Florida Forever application as director of land protection for the Conservation Foundation of the Gulf Coast in Osprey.
Osborne said the Conservation Foundation is still open to working with North Port officials or “anyone who wants to be a partner in these transactions.”
Finding a partner for the Orange Hammock deal is essential because the landowners want to sell the entire property and the Conservation Foundation only applied for enough state funding to purchase conservation easements on the three ranches.
The foundation will now look for public or private buyers for Orange Hammock. If a private buyer comes forward, ranching or other commercial activities that are compatible with a conservation easement might continue on the property, Osborne said.
A similar arrangement must be found for the Triangle Ranch in Manatee County. That property owner also wants to sell the entire ranch, not simply a conservation easement.
The owner of Sheps Island Ranch — the third property included in the Florida Forever application — is interested in a conservation easement only, Osborne said.
The three ranches cover a combined 7,564 acres and are conservatively valued at $14.2 million.
Triangle Ranch has three miles of frontage along the Myakka River on the state park's northern boundary. Sheps Island Ranch is visible from the main visitor area along the park's western boundary. Shielding it from development would help protect the visitor experience.
Osborne describes Orange Hammock Ranch as the largest undeveloped property in Sarasota County that “remains primarily in its natural condition.”
The property borders other conservation lands in the so-called Myakka Island region, and would add to the cluster of preserved properties surrounding the state park.
Orange Hammock was bought by a developer during the real estate boom and was once slated for 15,000 homes. That deal fell apart during the Great Recession. The property owner filed for bankruptcy protection and the ranch was claimed by the mortgage holder.
An effort to auction off the ranch in sections to private developers was unsuccessful.
Regardless, North Port leaders view the property as an important economic development opportunity. Most of the land in North Port is already subdivided into small lots created decades ago. Large properties that might be more suitable for commercial or high-end residential development are rare.
“If all the land goes where none of it is able to be used for development in North Port, that is a big concern,” said City Commissioner Jacqueline Moore.
Moore said she hopes city leaders and Conservation Foundation officials can work together on an alternative to completely preserving Orange Hammock. Foundation leaders said they are open to suggestions.
“That's a big piece of property,” Osborne said. “We're going to be talking to all the stakeholders.
“We understand that both the city and the county have interests and issues.”