Showing posts with label hearing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hearing. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 26, 2019

UDPDATE: Urgent action item from Sura Kochman regarding Siesta Promenade Hearing




From Sura Kochman:

FDOT has confirmed that there will be a hearing on 12/11. I have learned that 200-ish people e mailed Mr. Purvis and requested that the hearing take place. Thank you all so much. Parking is limited at the Siesta Key Chapel, so you may wish to car-pool.

The public hearing will be held from 5:30 p.m. to 7 p.m., Wednesday, December 11, 2019 at the Siesta Key Chapel, 4615 Gleason Avenue, Sarasota, FL 34242. The formal hearing begins at 6:00 p.m. FDOT will hold this hearing to give interested people the opportunity to review displays and talk one-on-one with staff. This public hearing will only address the transfer of jurisdiction of the roadways. If you wish to speak, please arrive prior to 6 p.m. and register as a speaker at the check-in table.

NOTE: It should be understood that FDOT has NO AUTHORITY, to override the Siesta Promenade application directly. What we can bring out, is the deficiencies in how the traffic is to be handled, per what was stated in the Siesta Promenade hearings, the Kimley Horn engineering reports, and the County transportation reports.

===

Dear All, 
This is an urgent, time sensitive matter! Action must be taken by December 3 – next Tuesday!

As many of you know, there is an agreement being worked on between FDOT & Sarasota County to transfer responsibility for Stickney Point and the roadways described in the attached notice in today’s paper, from FDOT to the County.

The Florida Department of Transportation has indicated that there are
 “…growing safety and operational concerns related to the intersection of US41 and SR 72.  The department has a responsibility to provide a safe and efficient roadway for our residents and the thousands upon thousands of visitors and tourists that come to our great state each year.”  This quote is from a letter dated 7/25/16, from Keith Slater, FDOT, Traffic Services Program Engineer.
It has been stated that should the road swap take place, that FDOT would have the opportunity to “weigh in”, but the ultimate decision would be the County’s.

FDOT’s  requirements are intrinsic to the evaluation of what is, or could occur in this 1 mile section of roadway.  Decisions made here will affect public safety and the economy of Siesta Key and surrounding areas. The responsibility for Stickney Point belongs under the jurisdiction of FDOT from US41 completely across the bridge and ending at SR 758.

FDOT’s oversight of this segment of SR72 (Stickney) should not be relinquished. 

PLEASE immediately email Kyle.Purvis@dot.state.fl.us and indicate that a hearing must be convened on December 11, 2019 and that you are interested in attending. 

This is our only opportunity to voice our concerns that FDOT, an independent agency, should be the controlling voice as to what is feasible traffic-wise on the Stickney Point approach to Siesta Key and on the key.

Sura

Write to Kyle.Purvis@dot.state.fl.us 


Saturday, June 2, 2018

Grand Lakes Hearing Interrupted by document submittal

A recent Sarasota County hearing of a Pat Neal proposal to alter certain features of Village plans met with disruption when one witness brought 400 pages of notes and documents into the record at the last minute.

For video, see the five-minute testimony of R.N. Collins that begins at the 3:01 mark.

Mr. Collins raised a series of policies and considerations of county code which appear relevant to the issues of the May 23, 2018 hearing - Pat Neal's "Grand Lakes" project on Ibis Street.

Mr. Collins introduced 400 pages of allegedly supporting documents, to the dismay of Mr. Neal's lawyer, Dan Bailey, and of some on the Board, who felt it was a bit late to bring such evidence into the process. 

But if the documents speak to the very issues at stake, it's fair to ask why these considerations were not brought to the Board's attention - by the Petitioner, or by staff - well before the final minutes of testimony. The hearing will be continued on July 11, 1:30 pm.


Post-lunch meeting audio 1 (16:43)

Post-lunch meeting audio 2 (00:21)

Graphics show the planned location of Grand Lakes. Courtesy SNL from Sarasota County

A map shows the location of Ibis Street and the planned extension, east of the site where Grand Lakes is proposed. Image courtesy Sarasota County

Thanks to the Sarasota News Leader for permission to use this story.

Thursday, August 24, 2017

A Win for the Birds

After 81 presentations from the public -- many which were brilliant, with little redundancy, covering a wide range of relevant, factual issues arising from the proposal from Mr. Gabbert, the Board of Commissioners voted 3-2 to DENY all three elements of the plan for a waste facility at the Celery Fields.




A warm and sincere thanks to all who saw the rightness of this cause and helped keep our Celery Fields open, pristine, and protected - at least for now. Photos from the hearing here.

What will happen with the "surplus" public lands is anyone's guess.

On Friday, tune in on WSRQ at 2 pm on The Detail for a round-up both of the hearing, and of the Aqua battle happening in Manatee County.

Below is a very rough paraphrase of the final decisive minutes of the 8.23.17 hearing. It is incomplete and may contain errors and omissions. The Herald article has been updated to offer some more detail.


Tom Matrullo Commissioner Detert moves to deny Critical Area Plan amendment - as per the Planning Commission "because we own the land." Motion DIES for lack of second. Commissioner Moran moves approval of Critical Area Plan amendment.Seconded by Maio.

Reply5 hrs
Manage
Tom Matrullo Al Maio - Mr. Gabbert and his team were very well behaved. I only heard two people mention "collusion" - everyone else behaved ok.

Reply
1
5 hrs
Manage
Tom Matrullo Hines: The planning commission weighed traffic heavily. If we approve the critical area plan amendment, we can't address traffic concurrency. Also, we need to consider the Celery Fields. But looking ahead, throwing in last minute stipulations that haven't been tied down, haven't been written yet. I'm struggling here. Mitigations are being proffered to protect the area.

Reply5 hrs
Manage
Tom Matrullo Detert - I think the area has changed so dramatically - in 1993 I'd have approved this, but now it's changed - so many residences; I think it comes down to property values. Mr.Gabbert is trying to do the right thing, and his business is worthwhile. We need to designate areas that don't have residences in them now. I think Mr. Gabbert missed the market.

Reply5 hrs
Manage
Tom Matrullo Maio - the county put a landfill 3 miles from my house - we all deal with things we don't want. There are no hard hearts here.

Reply5 hrs
Manage
Tom Matrullo Caragiulo - no reason to think Mr. Gabbert wouldn't operate in a competent and safe way. We have a problem with antiquated notification - 19th century way of doing things - doesn't foster trust.

Reply5 hrs
Manage
Tom Matrullo Caragiulo - This thing - once it's out there, it has its own life - it can be sold, someone else can run it. It's our property - we own property on both sides all the way down. It doesn't square with the area the way it is now. Today It was a remarkably sensitive and substantive discussion. I watched the Planning Commission deliberation 6 or 7 times. I can't get over those concerns.

Reply5 hrs
Manage
Cathy Cannon Antunes What about the industrial waste transfer facility 3 miles away? Is it the county's job to cannibalize that business? The one the applicant sold for $34 million? Sellers remorse?

Reply5 hrs
Manage
Tom Matrullo Caragiulo - Dumping loads of information - whether it comes in the form of a stipulation or traffic data - doesn't fill people with confidence. I don't want anything to do with things that do not foster confidence in government.

Reply5 hrsEdited
Manage
Tom Matrullo Moran: Thank everyone for patience and professionalism today. I got all kinds of misinformed email and fear-mongering. I thought we were miles away from a fact-based discussion, and what we heard changed my mind. Noise - it's near a roaring highway. Pollution - there's no evidence. It comes down to if not there, where? Contractors need an affordable option. I'm not discounting proximity to the Celery Fields. I lived near there. But I can't make my decision based on speculation, on what ifs. I was comfortable making my motion in favor of 2A.

Reply5 hrs
Manage
Tom Matrullo Detert: I would like to speak against the motion. Every time we try to sell the property we are going to have this conversation - I think they missed the market on this. Part of our job is to design the best community we can design. We own this property - we should take it off the surplus list. I do not rule by survey - there might be 200 people here all in agreement - but that doesn't mean they represent the 400,000 people. But it was great - you were all great. I want two college credits towards a masters degree.

Reply
1
5 hrs
Manage
Tom Matrullo Still over 100 people in the room.

Reply
1
5 hrs
Manage
Tom Matrullo Moran's motion in favor of critical area plan approval FAILS 3-2. (Moran and Maio for, Hines Caragiulo and Detert against).

Reply5 hrs
Manage
Tom Matrullo Detert moves to DENY the Critical area plan - passes 3-2 same vote as above.

Reply
1
5 hrs
Manage
Cathy Cannon Antunes That's great

Reply5 hrs
Manage
Tom Matrullo Motion to DENY rezone AND special exception - passes 3-2 - same votes.

Reply
1
1 minEdited
Manage
Tom Matrullo The Celery Fields live another day.

Reply
2