Showing posts with label andy mele. Show all posts
Showing posts with label andy mele. Show all posts

Thursday, September 3, 2020

Sarasota's new candidates have a lot to say -- but will the public get the chance to hear them?

In our area right now, we are fortunate to have several candidates who are knowledgeable and articulate on a broad range of environmental issues.

Unfortunately, the current state of local media is such that it's likely very little broad public attention will be given to our area's local candidates or issues in the 2020 General Election. More on this below.

Here's a brief intro to five of these challengers, all of whom have made the environment a key plank in their respective platforms:



Andy Mele has a long and strong history of advocacy in both New York and Florida, where he's led Suncoast Waterkeeper as well as taking a lead role in opposing the huge gypsum mining firm Mosaic. Andy is running for Florida House District 71.





Mark Pienkos is running against incumbent Mike Moran in District 1, where large-scale developments are getting approved and moving eastward at an accelerated rate. Pienkos sees serious custodianship of the environment as integral to maintaining Sarasota's highly regarded quality of life.




Cory Hutchinson is running for the County Commission against Nancy Detert in District 3 - the Venice area. One key element of his platform is renewable energy. Hutchinson also wants to prioritize infrastructure repairs, to stop sewage spills into our water.






"Our environment is everything," says Alice White, "it's why we chose to live here." White, who's running for the District 5 County Commission seat, has been a longtime North Port voice for good planning and good planting -- In fact she's known as "The Tree Lady."          





Brian Kelly
 is a candidate for Venice City Council and a lifelong resident of Sarasota. A co-founder of Hands Along the Water, his focus is to preserve our lands from over-development, to protect our water quality and the environment as a whole, and to extend the reach of public health. "We must protect our natural resources," he says, adding, "our state's fragile environment is at risk from powerful interests. I am frustrated by developers' destruction for short-term gains. Our kids will pay the ultimate price if we don't act now."



There's a lot more about the County Commission districts, candidates and issues at Citizens for District Power.

From the sudden spate of super hotels planned for Siesta Key to the efforts of the Old Miakka Community in the most rural eastern portion of Northeast Sarasota, some of the most significant local issues have to do with the impacts of planning and intense development upon the environment.

Each candidate is following his or her individual conscience and commitment, but behind their concerns looms a larger common question, lurking in Red Tide, in storm surges, in ever-stronger hurricanes, in polluted aquifers, in the disappearance of rural life: Is our way of living reaching a breaking point? 

Where are the public debates?

None of these challengers is accepting developer handouts. All deserve to be better known. Voters deserve sustained, illuminating, in-depth discussion at this critical time.  

No public debates were organized by the corporate media in Sarasota during the August Primaries. The Herald Tribune is not staging any forums or debates for the General Election. And here's no word as of yet from WWSB-Ch 7, or the Observer, or any or our corporate media as to how they will cover the election.

Two local groups are holding online forums: - click the links to obtain their schedules: 

Tiger Bay and the League of Women Voters are organizing Zoom Forum events.

Are our media trying to socially distance themselves from these issues? Some residents think so. If you feel that candidates running without large funding from developers deserve more media attention, please sign this Petition:

Sunday, December 11, 2016

Mele on mining, development, and environmental peril

Andy Mele, vice-chairman of the Sierra Club, Sarasota Manatee Group, and Suncoast Waterkeeper, offers some honest words about the phosphate industry, about freewheeling Sarasota developers, and the dire impacts on the environment now, with worse in the years to come.

Mele was interviewed on WSLR on Wednesday, December 7, 2016.

Excerpt on development and Comp Plan machinations in Sarasota County (6 mins)

Full Interview: Phosphate Mining in Manatee - Mosaic hearing Jan. 26, 2017 - Democrats' failure - current developer activity in Sarasota and Manatee counties - Pat Neal, Carlos Beruff, Benderson - future "feeding frenzy" east of I-75. (26 mins)



Audio interview thanks to:
WSLR Peace and Justice Report 9am on Wednesday
wslr.org 96.5 LPFM

Photo credit: Sarasota Observer

Wednesday, August 3, 2016

Mele on the blinding of Sarasota County - through language


Andy Mele:

Sarasota County's New Vision is . . .


Vague, imprecise and unenforceable 

. . . In many places (such as policy 1.3.6, allowing native habitats to be destroyed by development), the plan substitutes the word “encourage” for the word “shall.” “Shall” is precise, compulsory and enforceable. “Encourage” renders the entire section unenforceable and moot, and that is its intent. Again, both commissioners and county staff are adamant about keeping these changes, attributed to “public input,” but introduced at the behest of private interests.
For insight into this blurring of the lines between private and public interest, I went looking for confirmation in law that this distinction actually matters any more. 
I found it in Article II, Section 8 of the Florida Constitution.Turns out that in the state’s principal legal document, a county commissioner is responsible for, and accountable to, the public trust. 
The wording of this section is interesting, in light of the changes to the comprehensive plan. “The people shall have the right to secure and sustain that trust against abuse.” In the Florida Constitution, there is a bright and shining line between private and public interests. 
Yet, this plan “update” makes clear that both staff and the commission have been mingling public with private in a manner that contravenes the letter and spirit of the law.
I doubt that you would find 10 people in the county, outside the tight circle of beneficiaries, who think private interest is in the public’s benefit. Conflating the two in policy is called corruption, and here in America, we may practice corruption, but we don’t like it, and it is against the law. More here . . .




Tuesday, March 1, 2016

Residents sue Sarasota County over Whole Foods Fiasco

If you wish to support the lawsuit, the plaintiff organization's mailing address is:

P.O. Box 1728
Nokomis, FL 34274

Some added context can be found below the articles.

From WWSB

Posted: Monday, February 29, 2016 5:10 am

SARASOTA, Fla. -- At the corner of University Parkway and Honore Avenue sits 4 acres of previously protected wetlands. It's a last remaining piece of nature in the middle of urban sprawl, says environmentalist Andy Mele. 
"It feels like you're stepping into a medieval French cathedral," said Mele of the property, "with shafts of light coming down on water." 

The small piece of land is the site of a large controversy. Now there's lawsuit against Sarasota County.
"We've been watching them for awhile," said Mele of the County Commission, "and this is the place where we decided to draw the line."
In January, the county heard from those against construction as well as a few in favor. 
"I go to Whole Foods at least twice a week," said one local resident, "but I have to go all the way across town." 
Commissioners also heard from county staff who called the wetlands "relatively rare" with a "high degree of environmental importance." 
Ultimately the county voted to allow developer S.J. Collins to build a Whole Foods shopping center and Wawa convenient store, a decision environmentalists say goes against the county's comprehensive plan. 
In exchange, Collins agreed to purchase wetlands to be preserved in Manatee County's Rye Preserve, but Glenn Compton of Manasota 88 says that addition doesn't offset what's happening in Sarasota County.
"The fact is the wetlands that are being set aside would probably never be developed anyhow," said Compton, "so there's really nothing being gained." 
Plus, Compton says this could affect much more than just these four acres, potentially setting a precedent for other construction in the county. 
"We think we have a very good chance of winning this case," said Compton, "and hopefully not allowing for the precedents to continue moving forward."
=======

Herald Tribune:

SARASOTA COUNTY

Lawsuit may delay Whole Foods development plan

Plaintiffs say the county erred when approving the destruction of a wetland preserve for the shopping center's development.



Whole Foods was planning to open a new store at University Parkway near Interstate 75 as early as summer 2017.
HERALD-TRIBUNE ARCHIVE
Published: Monday, February 29, 2016 at 4:09 p.m.
Last Modified: Monday, February 29, 2016 at 4:09 p.m.
A new Whole Foods commercial center in north Sarasota County faces a likely yearlong delay, if not a complete derailment, after a lawsuit filed Friday by a group of environmental activists challenged the county's decision to let it develop over a wetland preserve.
Led by ManaSota-88, the group alleges county commissioners violated Sarasota County's growth management plan when, on Jan. 26, they removed longstanding stipulations protecting a forested wetland deemed by county staff as “rare and unique and important.”
The measure had passed 4-1 after about an hour of public comment. Commissioner Charles Hines cast the dissenting vote.
The environmentalists want the court to review the commissioners' decision by holding a “de novo trial,” which will allow both sides to present their cases and a judge to determine whether the original decision violated the long-range growth plan. If so, they want the court to invalidate the county's decision.
The complaint was filed in Sarasota County Circuit Court.
It could take at least a year for a judge to hear the case, said the environmentalists' attorney, Ralf Brookes. In the meantime, he doubts the project will proceed. That's because a judge can order the complete demolition of a development found to be inconsistent with the comprehensive plan, as upheld in a previous comprehensive plan consistency case, Pinecrest Lakes Inc. v. Shidel.
Because of that, Brookes said, “most developers don't proceed until a case is over. And we don't believe the county will issue permits while it's pending.”
County spokesman Jason Bartolone declined to comment, citing the pending litigation. Whole Foods spokeswoman Briana Madrid didn't respond to messages seeking comment, nor did Jeff Garrison of Atlanta-based SJ Collins Enterprises, which partners with the national grocery chain on development projects.
The 4.5-acre wetland sits at the northwest corner of the total property eyed for development, at the intersection of Honore Avenue and University Parkway. Included in the proposed development are a Whole Foods Market and a Wawa convenience store/gas station.
A spokesman for the project told commissioners in January that there is no other suitable site – it's at Honore and University or bust – and that the destroyed wetland would be offset by the purchase of 41 acres of environmentally sensitive land for protection nearby in Manatee County.
But the proposed mitigation site doesn't contain the same type of wetlands nor does it offer the same habitat for wildlife and birds as does the site targeted for development, said Glenn Compton of ManaSota-88, who called it “irreplaceable.”
Compton and others in the lawsuit noted that the county twice designated the wetland in question as a preserve area and had previously denied a prior owner's rezoning petition to develop the site and protect wetlands elsewhere.
They also cited the county's own growth management plan, which says “wetlands shall be preserved except in cases where they are no longer capable of performing defined environmental functions and values, or where no other reasonable alternative exists.”
The comprehensive plan guides the community's growth and sets criteria for commercial and residential development, transportation, parks and environmental protection. Amendments generally involve the county attorney's office, Bartolone said, without speaking specifically about the lawsuit.
“The comprehensive plan said they're supposed to preserve that land, and they ignored it,” said Gerry Swormstedt, one of the plaintiffs.
She and other plaintiffs worry the county will continue chipping away at environmentally sensitive land in favor of developers. They said it's time to stop.
“This is a very small lawsuit,” said plaintiff Andy Mele. “But it's part of a larger battle over the heart and soul of America.”
===

More context (courtesy of Bill Z.)

ManaSota-88 was founded in Manatee County by John and Gloria Rains back in the 70's to fight the phosphate industry in its attempts to gain mining permits in Manatee County. Becker Phosphate was the target company. Since that time, ManaSota-88 has continued on as a major environmental organization that has fought ferociously against some of the largest environmental threats over the years...often successfully. John and Gloria are now gone, but Glenn Compton leads it now...Glenn is a local science teacher who has put his heart and soul and his great intelligence into continuing the work that the Rains started so long ago.
If you wish to support the lawsuit, the organization's mailing address is:


ManaSota-88
P.O. Box 1728
Nokomis, FL 34274


The Pinecrest v Shidel case is what we usually refer to as the Martin County Case. I think it was around 2000, that a developer received approval for land use changes that would permit him to build a rental apartment complex. This approval was challenged in the public hearings as not being in compliance with the Martin County Comp Plan, but the Martin County Commission approved it anyway. A woman who lived adjacent to the property decided to challenge the approval in court. The developer scoffed at her case, inasmuch as he relied on the BCC approval, and he proceeded to build the $3,000,000 complex, and to rent the units. The woman won at the local circuit court level, and the developer was ordered to demolish the complex. He appealed, of course, scoffing once again, but perhaps with not quite so much confidence. The appeals court upheld the original circuit court decision, but the developer apparently could not believe that this demolition could come to pass...so he appealed to the Florida Supreme Court, which refused to hear the case, and thus the lower court ruling stood. The tenants all had to move out of the apartment complex, and it was actually razed to the ground! All because one woman stood her ground and asserted the protection of the Comp Plan. It took about 3 years, but there is no apartment complex on that site!

This is the reason this suit is so important. If, indeed, we are correct that the BCC approval to destroy the wetlands is not in compliance with the Comp Plan, then the courts will support that contention, and the wetlands can be saved. As Ralf Brookes said, in light of the Martin County Case, a developer would be taking a huge risk to proceed with construction in light of this serious legal challenge. In the long run, this is about much more than this one wetlands...it is about stopping these sorts of unlawful decisions.

So, if you want to support this effort to prevent our BCC from making these "So sue me" decisions, you can send a donation in any amount to ManaSota-88 at the address above. The only way to stop these decisions is by shutting them down through the legal process... by accepting their "so sue me" challenge!

Tuesday, February 3, 2015

Sarasota County to consider Private Shooting Range in Public Pinelands Reserve

via Andy Mele: (snipped in places):

Next Tuesday there is a Sarasota County Commission meeting to discuss re-zoning 44 acres of conservation lands in the Pinelands Reserve so that a private shooting range, blasting lead shot and PAH-laden so-called clay pigeons across the countryside, can be established. If this goes forward uncontested, the way will be clear for the rezoning, reclassification, recertification, re-what-have-you of any conservation lands in the county. The County is nominally the applicant, a feeble stab at establishing a public benefit component to this flagrant privatization of public land. I urge you all, and anyone else you can bring, to join me at this meeting to speak our piece.



What is our piece, exactly? There are two parts:

1. First, and most important, is the precedent this will set if it is allowed to move forward. All the protections afforded to Conservation Lands will have been swept aside, and pieces will be carved out until the county is unrecognizable
....
Voters again and again taxed themselves to conserve natural lands. The purpose of conservation land, (the Pinelands Reserve is listed, page 3-39, LMP) is "for the conservation of Sarasota County’s natural heritage.” (see below, LMP, page 3-15)
....

Pinelands Reserve, Sarasota County
2/ Second, to legally get this ill-considered measure through, the County will have to argue that the gun range is an environmentally benign activity. Here's why that argument falls apart before it even starts:
1. Lead shot. Nationwide, 9,000 gun ranges shoot 100-150 million pounds of lead shot every year. While best management calls for periodic soil scraping, separation of the lead, and then replacement of the soil, many ranges have always left the lead in place, and continue to do so.
There are three sources of lead in humans. Paint, dust & soil, and drinking water. Two of those three are present at a shooting range.
Lead shot oxidizes and becomes water soluble. In that state, it will attach to molecules in storm water, and migrate into both ground water and surface waters used for drinking. Florida's sandy soil is highly conducive to this migration.
2. Clay pigeons. These targets are not clay any more, but are made of some 30% petroleum pitch or coal tar products. They contain such high loads of PAH (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) that UK oil seed farmers have filed injunctions against farmers shooting skeet over oil seed fields. Very high levels of PAH in the oil seed resulted in thousands of tons of the agricultural product being incinerated as hazardous waste, at great expense. Remington. a major manufacturer of targets, claims on the box that they do not biodegrade. Gun magazine blogs say that the best way to get rid of the shattered targets is to crush them with your boots or run over them with your ATV until they are reduced to grit.
A single firing position will contaminate 2-5 acres. Most ranges have several firing positions. The clay target fragments are found in a fan shape 65'-250' from the firing position. Lead shot accumulates in a fan 375'- 600' out.
So far, only wild pigs have been observed eating the targets and gradually becoming sick. That said, EPA risk assessment has been performed for the humans who use or live near these facilities, and the results indicate significant risks to human health.
Please join me at the Board of County Commissioners meeting. Register to speak. If someone steals your thunder, or you change your mind, you are not obligated to speak. But this is a bad one. I hope to see you there.

===============

Editor's Note: See also Jono Miller's Blog Post about this issue.

The County has a brochure about the Birds of the Pineland Reserve.