Showing posts with label public records. Show all posts
Showing posts with label public records. Show all posts

Thursday, January 14, 2021

THE VIEW FROM TREASURE COAST

Sarasota County has been holding Zoom workshops - but does not retain the recorded Zoom files. Why Not?




Governments should make Zoom public comments permanent

Necessity, they say, is the mother of invention.

And few realized when this pandemic began that it would usher in an entirely new way for citizens to interact with their local governments.That is, if government officials permit it.

On the Treasure Coast, Martin County commissioners raised eyebrows in recent weeks when they announced commission meetings would be moved from a comparably large auditorium back to commission chambers in the County Administration Building. Quarters there are more cramped, which likely will deter some citizens from attending as COVID-19 rages.

Until recently those same citizens could have “participated” from the comfort of their own homes, via Zoom. Commission meetings were “broadcast” via the video conferencing service, and citizens were allowed to make public comments.

But with Gov. Ron DeSantis pushing local governments to get back to normal, commissioners decided to end Zoom commenting as well.

With the number of COVID-19 cases continuing to spike in Martin County and throughout Florida, this is the wrong move at the wrong time.

But in fact, it’s the wrong move, period.

Local governments around the state should not be looking to deep-six Zoom or any other videoconferencing program they’ve used during the pandemic. They ought to be looking for ways to permanently integrate the services into the governing process.

Local governments around the state should not be looking to deep-six Zoom or any other videoconferencing program they’ve used during the pandemic. They ought to be looking for ways to permanently integrate the services into the governing process. Zoom video conferences and Zoom commenting should be standard additions to the way local governments do business.

There nothing in Florida law that would require this, though a broad interpretation of the relevant statute might conclude the prohibition against public officials operating “in such a manner as to unreasonably restrict public access” dictates the Zoom lines should remain open, especially during the pandemic.

Nonetheless, we’d ask why any public officials would favor a narrower interpretation of the law when doing so makes local government less accessible to the average citizen.

Consider the homebound senior unable to attend county commission meetings in person – or others who for whatever reason may be unable to break away from home or the office to come in and have their say.

Sure, they can send a letter or an email; they can watch the proceedings online or on local cable public access. But this amounts to passive participation in government, whereas Zoom and services like it provide real-time opportunities to stand up and be heard.

Before the pandemic the potential of this technology for local government was not widely recognized. Now it’s impossible to ignore. Indeed the pandemic has provided us a glimpse into the future of how local citizens connect with their government. It has fostered closer connections, made it easier for citizens to say their piece, to follow along and perhaps raise objections in real time.

The cost of all this is a relative pittance.

Indeed, in so many ways, there’s no going back.

TCPalm/Treasure Coast Newspapers Editorial Board


Thursday, June 4, 2020

Accountability and Access: Are we missing something?

Board of Sarasota County Commissioners

Suppose you wanted to research how one or all of our publicly elected officials voted on a particular issue, perhaps one affecting your neighborhood. Obviously you would go to Sarasota County's public database where all votes are stored and can be found through searching by issue, date, name of a commissioner, etc. 

Umm, no.

No such database exists. The various county advisory board meetings such as the Planning Commission are videotaped -- the videos can be found via this Access Sarasota Page.

County Commission meetings are stored on video here, listed in chronological order. They are not contained in a database searchable by issues, agenda items, neighborhoods, dates, board votes, names of commissioners, etc.

You can request information on Board actions (see below), but if you wanted to do an analysis across time of how each Commissioner voted on, say, the environment, or on Pat Neal's latest gated community, your work is cut out for you. 

Our public officials are accountable for their votes, but it seems the method of accounting is a bit nebulous. Needles in haystacks come to mind. Yet our officials acting all the time on matters that involve tax dollars and impact our environment, roads, safety and services; they approve large scale plans and rezonings that alter the density and intensity of our neighborhoods. 

A searchable database of Board decisions would seem a sensible asset, creating a history of how we got to where we are.

What do you think?

Tom Matrullo
==

Below: Correspondence of June 4, 2020, in reverse chronological order:


=======

Good Morning Tom,

No, unfortunately we do not have a database that compiles that information.

If a citizen wants to know a specific vote taken by the Board for a resolution, contract, or ordinance they can send an e-mail request to: boardofrecords@sarasotaclerkandcomptroller.com  

We would then send a copy of the meeting Minutes to that citizen and they would be able to read the “board action/vote.”  

Besides this, there is no searchable database by issue or date for Board of County Commission actions.

You may also access “Meetings on Demand” online for information on agendas, packets, action agenda, official minutes, and videos here:



Thank you.

Blanca Montoya
Recording Secretary, Board Records Department
Karen E. Rushing
Clerk of the Circuit Court and County Comptroller
1660 Ringling Boulevard - Suite 210, Sarasota, FL 34236
www.SarasotaClerk.com

====

Good morning,

I have been referred to this address (sarasotaclerkandcomptroller.com) in the course of seeking a pubicly accessible database of County Commission votes searchable by issue, date, individual commissioner vote, and Board action. (See below for prior correspondence.)

Please advise whether such a database exists, and if so how to access it. If such information is not captured in a publicly searchable database, your help on how a citizen can research the voting record of the Board of County Commissioners and its members would be appreciated.

Thank you.

Tom Matrullo

=====
=====

To:  commissioners@scgov.net,
Alan Maio <amaio@scgov.net>,
"Charles D. Hines" <CHines@scgov.net>,
Michael Moran <mmoran@scgov.net>,
Christian ziegler <cziegler@scgov.net>,
"Nancy C. Detert" <ncdetert@scgov.net>,
Jonathan Lewis <countyadministrator@scgov.net>,
Jody Mann <jmann@scgov.net>

To the Board of County Commissioners and Administrator:

Please advise where to access Sarasota County's public record of all Commission votes in database form. That is, if a citizen wished to track down how the Board voted on an issue, the database that provides the date, link to meeting discussion, how each Board member voted, and Board action.

Thank you,

Tom Matrullo

==


Good Morning Mr. Matrullo,

To my knowledge there is no database of this nature.  You may check with Board Records at boardofrecords@sarasotaclerkandcomptroller.com or call them at 861-5279.

Thank you,


Jody Mann
Administrative Specialist to Commissioners
Michael A. Moran, CIC, Chair - District One
Alan Maio – District Four
Sarasota Board of County Commissioners
1660 Ringling Boulevard, Sarasota, FL 34236
Office: 941-861-5398

 =======

fI liberty and equality, as is thought by some, are chiefly to be found in democracy, they will be best attained when all persons alike share in government to the utmost. - Aristotle




Saturday, February 20, 2016

Sarasota EDC settles public records suit


From the Sarasota News Leader:


EDC to pay $50,000 in attorney’s fees to settle public records and open meetings lawsuits filed by Citizens for Sunshine



EDC board voted on the mediation settlement on Feb. 18, following the nonprofit board’s approval

The board of the Economic Development Corp. (EDC) of Sarasota County voted this week to approve a settlement with Citizens for Sunshine, a Sarasota nonprofit organization, involving public records and open meetings lawsuits dating to 2009 and 2010, respectively.
The agreement calls for the EDC to pay a total of $50,000 to Andrea Flynn Mogensen, the Sarasota attorney who represented Citizens for Sunshine in the cases.
The first lawsuit was filed “after the EDC refused to provide access to records sought about its activities, including economic development grants and other incentives paid for with public tax dollars,” says a Citizens for Sunshine press release. The second case followed the organization’s discovery that the EDC was not complying with open meetings guidelines of Chapter 119 of the Florida State Statutes, known as the Sunshine Laws, the release adds.
The settlement calls for the EDC to provide Citizens for Sunshine access to records relating to Project Yellow, “which was a $200 million deal to lure a Danish pharmaceutical manufacturer to relocate to the Sarasota area,” the press release says. “Although the deal fell through,” the release adds, “Citizens insisted that records relating to Project Yellow be disclosed except for those involving trade secrets.”

The EDC board’s action came during a meeting that began at 8 a.m. on Feb. 18, the organization’s attorney, Morgan Bentley of Bentley & Bruning in Sarasota, told The Sarasota News Leader. Michael Barfield, a paralegal in Mogensen’s office — who is also vice president of the Florida Chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) — told the News Leader that Citizens for Sunshine’s board had approved the agreement earlier.Those documents are to be provided to the nonprofit within 15 days of the effective date of the settlement.
Sarasota County also was a party to the public records case, but the County Commission did not have to vote on the settlement because the amount of attorney’s fees is within the range that County Administrator Tom Harmer can handle without board action, according to county policy, Barfield said.
The agreement was reached during court-ordered mediation on Jan. 21, which lasted all day, Barfield told the News Leader.
The public records case had been set for trial on June 27 in the 12th Judicial Circuit in Sarasota, Sarasota County Clerk of Court records show.
In the release, Mogensen called the agreement “historic,” noting, “[I]t’s the first EDC in the state that has agreed to operate in the sunshine.”