Letter from architect and longtime resident Bill Zoller:
Commissioners:
I am a long-time resident of Sarasota County, and I am writing today to request that you recommend denial of the above-referenced petitions. Living not far from the Celery Fields since 1972, and having observed the transition from active celery-production to a valuable stormwater, recreation, and wildlife facility, this property, and the open space around it, it is apparent to all that this area has become a very special place…to residents and to visitors and tourists alike. When the County purchased these lands from primarily the Ferlisi and Walker families for the intended purpose of preventing future flooding, it was not generally realized that this intended purpose would turn out to be just one of the many benefits to the community.
As the Celery Fields stormwater facility came to fruition, the area to the east was largely undeveloped, and there were some small light industrial uses to the west. As the ponds began to fill, and plants grew, the birds and other wildlife began to flock to this “refuge”. Sarasota Audubon was quick to understand what a unique opportunity this presented, and through their efforts, the County came on board to assist in making the Celery Fields a birding destination. Not only did the birds flock to the Celery Fields, but so did the eco-tourists…from all over the world. Over the past few years, Audubon and the County made an arrangement that permitted Audubon to build a first-class resource facility right at the center of the Celery Fields. I’m sure a look at the Audubon guestbook would reveal a startling number of visitors from far and wide.
When Palmer Boulevard was repaired and improved (while still remaining a two-lane road), the County erected tall, large lights along the road. It became immediately apparent to citizens and to Audubon, that these lights could be a serious threat to the nesting and breeding of the birds and other creatures that made the Celery Fields their home. When this was brought to the County’s attention, the County recognized the vulnerability and sensitivity of the wildlife, and realized that the lights were, indeed a threat. In fact, while the County did not remove the lights (in case they might be needed in a storm/flood emergency, they have never been turned on…they remain dark to this day. They remain dark because it is the right thing to do…and because a threat to the success of the Celery Fields as a nature/wildlife preserve is a threat to eco-tourism, which is a threat to our tourist economy.
This preamble brings us to the subject at hand: an industrial construction debris processing plant proposed for the edge of the Celery Fields. While many of the assertions made by the applicant in his submittal lack documentation (as required), and can be examined in detail, the crux of the matter comes down to the compatibility of this sort of noisy, dusty, plant with the valuable recreational/nature/wildlife preserve that is the Celery Fields. The County itself has, as outlined above, recognized the vulnerability of the wildlife in the Celery Fields; the County has recognized that turning on the lights would be a big risk…a risk they were unwilling to take. Is not a construction debris processing plant a risk to the welfare of the wildlife? The proposed facility will grind, crush, and haul away concrete, wood, metal, plastics, and all manner of material, some of which may well contain toxic materials. With the eastern areas out along Palmer Blvd. having been developed over the past few years, residential traffic has increased many-fold on the road. The trucks that would haul these materials in and out would also create heavy traffic on an already inadequate road, in addition to more noise and pollution. Is this a risk worth taking?
While the application asserts that no endangered wildlife has been seen on the site, where is a report by a qualified expert documenting this statement? There are statements about noise levels of similar facilities in the area, but where is a report laying out these levels, including the noise levels of the surrounding areas of those facilities (keeping in mind that the Celery Fields area is a very quiet area)? The vagueness of these sorts of statements calls into question where staff’s reassurances come from. Is staff qualified in each of these technical areas to render judgment on the validity of the applicant’s assertions, given a lack of qualified documentation?
Commissioners, you are familiar with the Celery Fields. You understand the vulnerabilities of the plants and creatures to noise and to pollution of air or water. Sarasota has a world-class triple-duty facility that is enjoyed by residents and visitors, and that brings substantial economic benefits to the County. We always come back to the issues of the health, safety, and welfare of the entire community. The benefit to one must be weighed against the risk to all; is it worth risking?
Again, Commissioners, please recommend to the County Commission that these petitions for a construction waste processing plant be denied. To answer my own question, No, it is not worth the risk.
Sincerely yours,
William C. Zoller
6375 McKown Road
Sarasota 34240
Showing posts with label wildlife. Show all posts
Showing posts with label wildlife. Show all posts
Wednesday, May 31, 2017
Wednesday, May 17, 2017
The word is out
On Thursday, June 1, Sarasota's Planning Commission will hold a hearing on a proposal to build a 15-acre, unenclosed waste processing plant on public lands very near the Celery Fields Preserve and Bird Sanctuary. For the first time, the body will begin its meeting at 5 p.m.
Planning Commission Meeting on Celery Fields
5 pm (information rally at 4 pm)
County Administration Building, 1st Floor
1616 Ringling Blvd.
Below is a recent letter to the Commission: (See below if you wish to write a letter or email)
Commissioners:
On June 1, the Planning Commission is scheduled to vote on zoning change which would pave the way for this travesty to be built.
However, there are a few problems.
Cement crushing produces large amounts of cement dust which we believe will not be controlled. With 35 ft. or higher piles of it, and prevailing winds up to 25 miles per hour or more, this dust (which can cause silicosis, lung cancer, and COPD) could easily be blown into Celery Fields and communities beyond. Cement crushing machines, backhoes and large loaders will be creating horrific noise which will exceed the maximum levels allowed by the Sarasota County Noise Ordinance. In addition, the dust and noise will have major negative impacts on the birds and wildlife of the area.
This proposed heavy industrial use is completely incompatible with the longtime use of Celery Fields as a beautiful and immensely popular Sarasota site for bird watching and outdoor recreation.
We are asking concerned citizens and nature lovers to come to the Planning Commission before 5pm, put in a speakers card and make your voice heard in opposition to the approval of the zoning change and of this terrible proposal.
===
This letter was published in the Herald Tribune on May 17, 2017.
Laura.Benson@sarasotaadvisory.net
Cement crushing produces large amounts of cement dust which we believe will not be controlled. With 35 ft. or higher piles of it, and prevailing winds up to 25 miles per hour or more, this dust (which can cause silicosis, lung cancer, and COPD) could easily be blown into Celery Fields and communities beyond. Cement crushing machines, backhoes and large loaders will be creating horrific noise which will exceed the maximum levels allowed by the Sarasota County Noise Ordinance. In addition, the dust and noise will have major negative impacts on the birds and wildlife of the area.
This proposed heavy industrial use is completely incompatible with the longtime use of Celery Fields as a beautiful and immensely popular Sarasota site for bird watching and outdoor recreation.
We are asking concerned citizens and nature lovers to come to the Planning Commission before 5pm, put in a speakers card and make your voice heard in opposition to the approval of the zoning change and of this terrible proposal.
Jami Caseber, Environmental Information Coordinator - Palmer East Group
- Former Director - Citizens Opposing a Polluted Environment (COPE)
- Former Chair of the Berkeley Community Advisory Commission (CEAC)
- Recipient of Clean Air Champions Award from the San Francisco Bay Area Air Quality Management District for Work on Air Pollution
- Co-author, Berkeley Hazardous Waste Importation Regulation Act
- Organizer of campaign that halted the siting of hazardous waste incinerators in the San Francisco Bay Area
- Recipient, Special Award from the American Lung Association for work on Air Pollution
- Certificate of Distinguished Contribution to the City and its Citizens, Berkeley, CA
===
This letter was published in the Herald Tribune on May 17, 2017.
If you wish to write to the Commission, the names and email addresses of the 9 members and school board rep are below. To see former hearings, go to this page and look for the date or agenda of the meeting you are interested in. (The Oct. 20, 2016 meeting is here).
Jack.Bispham@sarasotaadvisory.net
Kevin.Cooper@sarasotaadvisory.net
Ron.Cutsinger@sarasotaadvisory.net
Mark.Hawkins@sarasotaadvisory.net
Robert.Morris@sarasotaadvisory.net
Joseph.Neunder@sarasotaadvisory.net
Colin.Pember@sarasotaadvisory.net
Andrew.Stultz@sarasotaadvisory.net
Kathie.Ebaugh@sarasotaadvisory.net
(Ebaugh is non-voting School Board rep)
Kevin.Cooper@sarasotaadvisory.net
Ron.Cutsinger@sarasotaadvisory.net
Mark.Hawkins@sarasotaadvisory.net
Robert.Morris@sarasotaadvisory.net
Joseph.Neunder@sarasotaadvisory.net
Colin.Pember@sarasotaadvisory.net
Andrew.Stultz@sarasotaadvisory.net
Kathie.Ebaugh@sarasotaadvisory.net
(Ebaugh is non-voting School Board rep)
Wednesday, April 5, 2017
Letter from Sarasota Audubon to Commissioner Al Maio
Sarasota Board of County Commissioners
1660 Ringling Blvd-Second Floor
Sarasota, FL 34236
February 22, 2017
Dear Commissioner Maio,
I know you are all well aware of the parcels up for rezoning, sale and development at the Corner of Apex Road and Palmer Boulevard. I also know that several groups have and are organizing protests against the sale of these sites for commercial development. This letter is on behalf of Sarasota Audubon Society which speaks for itself and no others.
A BENEFICIAL COLLABORATION
The Collaboration between Sarasota County and Sarasota Audubon was specifically entered into in order to enhance and develop the Celery Fields as a haven for wildlife and for passive recreation. Working together, we have achieved that goal. The Celery Fields is one of the most well-known birding hotspots in Florida, hosting visitors from all over the world (see attached visitor logs). The financial impact of a prime birding site cannot be overstated; birders spend lots of money in pursuit of their hobby. In order for the Celery Fields to maintain its prime eco-tourism reputation, Audubon and the County are continually improving habitat, and therefore the Celery Fields experience for all. The investment by Sarasota Audubon of $1.4 million at the Celery Fields is testament to the area's rich birdlife.
THE IMPACT OF HEAVY AND NEARBY COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
I want to make a few points about birds: The Fields provide forage for 3 Federally listed species of birds, for 8 Florida listed species and provides safe nesting for 48 bird species (see attached Celery Fields checklist). This is a phenomenal number in such an urban area. However, some of these birds (and ecotourism) will be at risk for the following reasons:
- Noise and ground vibration of traffic, especially heavy trucks, impact breeding rates of birds
- An inadequate buffer zone between the Fields and commercial development will push birds further into the Fields setting up competition for food, thereby reducing survival rates
- The eco-tourism aspects of the Fields will be degraded due to increased commercial interests
In view of our concerns for the future use of the sites at the corners of Apex and Palmer, we request the BCC deny the proposed rezone action and create an advisory group of affected citizen stakeholders to Work with County staff in determining a land use suitable to the affected parties and the citizens of Sarasota County. The recommendations of this group will be presented to the BCC for further action if necessary.
We are grateful for the BCC's Support of Sarasota Audubon over all these years and hope we can continue to work together for the benefit of wildlife and the eco-tourism sector.
Sincerely,
Jeanne Dubi, President
Tuesday, September 30, 2014
What is the cost of deteriorated wildlife habitats?
Reposted from the Herald Tribune -
NEW: Wildlife numbers cut in half, group says
Canada lynx
FILE - In this April 19, 2005 file photo, a Canada lynx heads into the Rio Grande National Forest after being released near Creede, Colo. Canada lynx gained federal protections in New Mexico on Thursday, Sept. 11, 2014, but U.S. wildlife officials again declined to designate critical habitat for the elusive wild cats in the Southern Rockies, parts of New England and other areas not considered essential to their survival. The two-part finding from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service means the forest-dwlling lynx will be protected as threatened throughout the lower 48 states. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski, File)
ASSOCIATED PRESS
JOHN HEILPRIN, Associated Press
Published: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 at 5:49 a.m.
Last Modified: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 at 5:49 a.m.
GENEVA - Populations of about 3,000 species of wildlife around the world have plummeted far worse than previously thought, according to a new study by one of the world's biggest environmental groups.
The study Tuesday from the Swiss-based WWF largely blamed human threats to nature for a 52-percent decline in wildlife populations between 1970 and 2010.
It says improved methods of measuring populations of fish, birds, mammals, amphibians and reptiles explain the huge difference from the 28-percent decline between 1970 and 2008 that the group reported in 2012.
Most of the new losses were found in tropical regions, particularly Latin America.
WWF describes the study it has carried out every two years since 1998 as a barometer of the state of the planet.
"There is no room for complacency," said WWF International Director General Marco Lambertini, calling for a greater focus on sustainable solutions to the impacts that people are inflicting on nature, particularly through the release of greenhouse gases.
The latest "Living Planet" study analyzed data from about 10,000 populations of 3,038 vertebrate species from a database maintained by the Zoological Society of London. It is meant to provide a representative sampling of the overall wildlife population in the world, said WWF's Richard McLellan, editor-in-chief of the study.
It reflects populations since 1970, the first year the London-based society had comprehensive data. Each study is based on data from at least four years earlier.
Much of the world's wildlife has disappeared in what have been called five mass extinctions, which were often associated with giant meteor strikes. About 90 percent of the world's species were wiped out around 252 million years ago. One such extinction about 66 million years ago killed off the dinosaurs and three out of four species on Earth.
In the new WWF study, hunting and fishing along with continued losses and deterioration of natural habitats are identified as the chief threats to wildlife populations around the world. Other primary factors are global warming, invasive species, pollution and disease.
"This damage is not inevitable but a consequence of the way we choose to live," said Ken Norris, science director at the London society. "There is still hope. Protecting nature needs focused conservation action, political will and support from industry."
See also: rewilding
See also: rewilding
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)