Showing posts with label benderson mall. Show all posts
Showing posts with label benderson mall. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 1, 2015

Nighswander LTE: Mall expansion at the expense of safety


Letter to the Editor



From:  Vicki Nighswander MAT,MPH
             ......
             Sarasota, FL 34233


Commissioners Chose Expansion vs Safety


All County Commissioners received an email prior to their Benderson expansion meeting requesting a postponement until they have time to review the annual crash report.  I was told the crash report would be completed in May.  At a public hearing one commissioner stood up and noted that safety was of primary importance but yet existing crash data isn’t included in development decisions.  We are no longer living in a small community.  We are experiencing the consequences of growth. Modifying roads, intersections, bridges and lights after the fact isn’t safety first thinking.  The vote for the Benderson expansion, among others, and not paying attention to existing data doesn’t show safety concern for the Commissioner’s constituency. There are Band-Aid components of the approval, but ultimately our safety wasn’t a primary consideration.  Hope we all remember how these Commissioners voted for development expansion vs constituent safety for the next election. 

Andre Mele: The Army Corps of Engineers can save us from Benderson . . .

County Commissioners Give Benderson 37% Increase in UTC Development

Yesterday, the Sarasota Board of County Commissioners voted unanimously to approve Benderson Development’s request for a 37% increase in the amount of development permitted at the University Town Center campus at the intersection of I-75 and University Parkway.

In doing so, the County may have set itself on a collision course with the federal government.

Benderson UTC Mall, Sarasota/Manatee Lakewood Ranch
 I was there to remind the Commissioners and other parties of a long-suppressed piece of information: the Army Corps of Engineers permit that was the first and overarching set of conditions by which all future development, mitigation and conservation would be guided.  The conditions set forth by the Corps were unequivocal, and have been supported by emails from Corps staff.  The conditions of the permit are permanent and binding, and stipulate that the 51-acre parcel south of DeSoto Road, as well as the northward-extending Cooper Creek wildlife corridor, are to be preserved in perpetuity as mitigation for the development’s filling of wetlands, and subsequent construction. 

The preservation in perpetuity totaling some 74 acres of this high-quality upland habitat was, in itself, the mitigation.  The permit conditions included some built wetlands, some enhanced wetlands, and some removal of invasive species, but the centerpiece of the permit was to be a conservation easement and subsequent preservation, protecting this land, and a number of endangered species that have been observed there, forever.  Period.  Unlike the SWFWMD conservation easement, which isn’t worth the paper it’s printed on, and has merely allowed Benderson Development to hold the property for future development while paying no taxes.

Plainly alarmed, the Commissioners stared at me, as I was presenting, like deer caught in the headlights. The fix was in, the vote ordained, but how could they vote as instructed if I was right?  After all, Randy Benderson himself was in the front rows, along with a horde of lawyers and consultants, probably costing him upwards of $4,000 an hour.  Another developer, Rod Krebs, who attends every meeting, was present.  As was Bob Waechter, the Republican machine’s enforcer, who, with Eric Robinson, is well-known (and a convicted felon) for dispensing dark PAC money – or withholding it – illegally removing opposing campaign signs, and illegally mass-mailing concocted character assassinations.  Glowering in the back row, he literally cast a pall over the room.    

After the public input session, the Commission adjourned to give County staff and the horde of suits time to huddle over the Corps permit, to find something that would get the Commissioners off the hook, and allow them to vote as they were intending to vote.  At last they broke up, and Matt Osterhoudt, manager of Development Services and the County’s Environmental Protection department, looked triumphant.  Back in session, Osterhoudt proclaimed, under oath, that the Corps permit had expired.  Mistaking, intentionally or not, the compliance deadline for permit expiration – of which there is none – Osterhoudt threw himself under the bus for his masters, and gave them the erroneous sense of security that there was nothing to worry about in the Corps permit.  The preordained vote went forward.


The only positive note in this exchange came as Osterhoudt reminded Benderson Development that they would be required to renegotiate a permit for all the intended takings of preservation lands, wetlands, and mitigation uplands for development. 

It won’t be easy. The federal government is largely beyond the reach of local corruption and undue influence.  While it is said that the Corps never denies a developer a permit, it still takes what it negotiates in its permits very seriously, and is reluctant to give away further concessions to developers.  If 74 acres of wetlands are to be mitigated, 74 acres will still be mitigated, just differently.

It may be years before Benderson Development has all the necessary permits to proceed with the construction that the County gave its permission for yesterday. 

Sometimes, the victories come out of the interstices, the places between the facts.

And there still remains the matter of the Corps having assigned responsibility for the permit’s preservation requirements to the County, and what, if any, impact yesterday’s vote will have on that. Has the County Commission acted in violation of a federal permit?  Stay tuned.

I will be drafting a letter to the Corps, relating the above facts, and suggesting that their enforcement division take an interest in how Sarasota County operates.  I will also be drafting an email to the Commissioners and their staff attorney, correcting the misleading information given to them by Osterhoudt, and attaching a copy of my letter to the Corps. 

At that point, until a new permit application affords the opportunity for public input, my bag of tricks is empty, unless someone comes forward who would like to sue the County. 

Best regards, and thanks for your support,
Andy 

Sunday, May 17, 2015

The Numbers: A profile of Benderson Development's impact on our area

By Cooper Levey-Baker for Sarasota Magazine:

THE COMPANY


700-plus
No. of properties owned by Benderson Development Company
40 million-plus
National square footage owned by Benderson
14.2 million
Square footage of property owned by Benderson and related companies in Sarasota County
$55.4 million
Just (market) value of those Sarasota County properties
22.5 million
Square footage of property owned by Benderson and related companies in Manatee County
$176.4 million
Just value of those Manatee County properties
840.6
Total minimum acreage of properties in both counties
Source: Sarasota and Manatee County Property Appraisers

THE MALL 


880,000
Square footage of The Mall at University Town Center
Source: Benderson and Taubman Centers press release
$315 million
Cost of mall development
Source: Benderson and Taubman Centers press release
$7.1 million
Total impact fees paid by Benderson, Taubman, Macy’s, Saks and Dillard’s to Sarasota County for the mall
Source: Sarasota County
$142,000
Property taxes paid on the mall by Benderson and Taubman in 2014
$7.1 million
State’s total design cost for the diverging diamond interchange at University Parkway and I-75
$83 million
State’s total estimated cost of diverging diamond interchange
Benderson Sarasota

THE ROWING PARK


There's more - much more -- to Cooper Levey-Baker's research at Sarasota Magazine. Read it here.

Wednesday, January 28, 2015

Gigantizing Benderson: Media story and comment

Via the Sarasota Herald Trib:

Benderson [Development Co.] has proposed adding another 600,000 square feet of retail and 100,000 square of office space to the University Town Center, bringing the project’s total footprint to 2.58 million square feet of commercial development. Nearly 1,800 homes also will be built on the site southwest of the University Parkway-Interstate 75 interchange.
....
[Sarasota County] Commissioners on Tuesday agreed to alter the county’s comprehensive plan, the first step needed to allow the UTC expansion to proceed. Those amendments will now go before the state for review.
Approval of many other aspects of the plan was delayed until May 6.
County officials and Benderson could not agree on how the development would impact preserved forest wetlands and mesic hammocks on the property.
As part of the expansion, Benderson has proposed building on more than 50 acres previously set aside for conservation.
Under the developer’s plan, loss of the majority of those wetlands would be offset by preservation in another area of Manatee County, pending approval from the Southwest Florida Water Management District.
But the latest site plans filed by Benderson would bulldoze over 54 percent of the mesic hammocks now growing on the property. County codes protect the unique habitat by only allowing developers to impact up to 25 percent.

====

An astute observer of growth politics and planning in Sarasota county offered this comment (emphasis added):

Benderson wants to expand... the key word there is "wants". One can understand that...certainly no secret that that is the business Benderson is in. The issue, though, is this: is this expansion needed by the community? Is it in the best interests of the community? Those are the questions that our elected representatives need to deal with first...not the details of the proposal. The sense I get from the article is this: there are a few unseemly wrinkles (wetlands, for example) that would not make good PR for the BCC, so they have given Benderson an indication of what they need to do to make their "story" more palatable... and not cast an ugly shadow on the BCC as they do Benderson's bidding. Interesting that the headline says that the BCC will (not, "may", or "considers") change the growth plan. So here's my question: does the "community's" input matter? Do "we" have any real voice in this? Will the City of Sarasota raise its voice in alarm as Benderson plans to suck more businesses out of downtown? Given that the UTC has sucked Saks, Wiliams Sonoma, Pottery Barn, Banana Republic, Dillards, etc. out of Southgate, that is certainly not a hypothetical issue.

Wednesday, November 12, 2014

Affordable Housing nowhere in sight for 2000 mall workers

via the SH_T:

Mall may widen gap between renters, homeowners


Published: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 at 4:43 p.m.
Last Modified: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 at 4:43 p.m.
SARASOTA - The new Mall at University Town Center is expected to lift values for middle-class homes that pepper the University Parkway corridor.

Enlarge |
Las Palmas Condominums, in the foreground, are among the residential properties nearest to the Mall at University Town Center.
STAFF PHOTO / MIKE LANG

Facts

BY THE NUMBERS

• 4,827 home sales during third quarter
• $195,650 median home price
• $1,355 average three-bedroom rent
• 108-year wait for subsidized one-bedroom housing
• 1,700 condo-style housing units planned for the mall by Benderson Development
But because developers have generally failed to meet rental demand for the 2,000 mall workers, avoiding earlier agreements to build affordable housing as part of UTC approvals, apartment rents that are climbing at the fastest clip in a decade are projected to rise further out of reach.
That could widen the gap between homeowners and renters in this region, boosting competition for housing near the mall and further tightening supply.
Analysts say that scenario will benefit homeowners already in a comfortable living situation, while making it harder for workers living paycheck-to-paycheck to find decent digs nearby.
“It's great the mall will create these additional jobs, but the vast majority are hourly with no benefits, and the cost of living has gone up so much, most of these folks will have to live somewhere else and drive to the mall,” said Jack McCabe, a Florida real estate consultant.
“There's just nothing affordable within walking distance, and the rapid rise in rental rates is far outpacing what most workers can afford,” McCabe said.
Median home prices during the third quarter reached $195,650 in the North Port-Sarasota-Bradenton area, a figure that continues to flirt with its post-recession peak, Realtor data show.
Meanwhile, the average fair market rent for a three-bedroom home in Sarasota and Manatee was $1,355 in August, according to industry researcher RealtyTrac Inc.
Only Broward, Miami-Dade and Monroe counties have higher average rents in Florida.
The new mall is expected to boost demand for housing along the University corridor, from the 2,000 employees expected to work at the retail hub and retirement homebuyers who want to live nearby.
Already, Realtors are using the mall as a sales pitch in their listings, much like they do for the area's beaches.
Some homebuyers are avoiding the region over traffic concerns. Others want to live near the action, said Gloria Weed, managing broker for the Michael Saunders & Co. brokerage in Lakewood Ranch.
“Some people see it a great draw, and they're going to want to live here because of the mall,” Weed said. “And others are concerned.
“We just don't know what we have here yet.”
Even amid a development uptick, residential supply has not kept pace with ballooning demand, especially in the lower price points.
In October, Iberia Bank sold nine acres out of foreclosure near the corner of Fruitville and Cattlemen roads to a subsidiary of Sarasota Apartment Development Group. If the buyer ultimately builds apartments on the land, it would help feed housing demand near the mall.
MI Homes also is building 62 townhomes near the University Town Center mall, the latest in what is expected to be a rush of multifamily development near the new shopping hub.
The project joins a 237-unit apartment complex dubbed The Venue at Main Street Lakewood Ranch. The first phase of The Venue is open for leasing, with apartments that are expected to attract more upscale tenants.
Two other apartment projects are in the works for Lakewood Ranch.
The vast majority of those homes and rentals will be priced beyond what mall workers and many other families in the area can afford.
“We have a big gap, and that's a real concern because these workers will have to live somewhere,” said Joe Murphy, a real estate agent with Coldwell Banker who specializes in that area of town. “Every new home project we've seen is priced beyond their reach. Even the apartments are going to be expensive.”
“We have really priced out our workforce.”
Mall co-developer Benderson Development Co. has said it plans to build up to 1,700 condo-style housing units near the mall, through a mix of both rentals and for-sale units, although the company has been mum on the details.
In 2007, Benderson agreed to affordable housing stipulations to gain government approvals for UTC, with promises to build as many as 437 homes that would be affordable to middle-income buyers.
But when the Great Recession crimped construction plans, Sarasota County commissioners agreed to allow Benderson to push forward with the retail segment first — and eventually to shed the affordable housing element altogether.
At the time, both sides were armed with studies that showed a sharp drop in local real estate prices had erased the need for more affordable homes.
But since then, a robust recovery has once again thinned the supply of rentals and homes for sale that are within the reach of most typical workers, especially lower-income families.
Todd Mathes, Benderson's director of development said although the company is not obligated, many of the homes to be built at UTC will still meet the previous stipulations tied to the property.
“The mall has had a tremendously positive impact on real estate,” Mathes said. “Everyone recognizes increases in the neighborhoods.”
There are now more than 500 applicants for a one-bedroom unit in Sarasota with rent that is subsidized below market standards by the government, but historically only five of those apartments open up each year, county records show.
That leaves a wait of 108 years.
“Benderson came in with a plan for a mixed-use, walkable community, with some substantial affordable housing,” said Dan Lobeck, an area attorney who advocates for slower growth. “After huge campaign contributions to county commissioners, they got that aspect repealed. This is the pattern we're seeing with development.”
Much of the residential growth near the mall also will be subject to recent changes to Sarasota County's 2050 plan, including a proposal to increase density east of Interstate 75 and south of University Parkway.
Critics fear that will only heighten the affordable housing gap. Earlier in October commissioners overhauled the rural growth regulations, amid community concerns over environmental harm, housing sprawl and the cost of development to taxpayers through infrastructure like roads and emergency services.
“Because we have very few projects going on, there has been and there will continue to be some pent-up demand,” said Kirk Boylston, president of LWR Commercial Realty. “We have kind of been playing catch up a little bit.”
Real estate analysts say those already living in established homes near the mall are poised to see the biggest benefit.
There is not a lot of empirical data to quantify a shopping mall's impact on surrounding real estate.
In areas of South Florida, where similar luxury centers have sprouted, values have generally increased. Most appraisers expect similar results in northern Sarasota and Southeast Manatee.
But they say it will depend on the price points at which existing homes will start changing hands — and how that compares with pricing before the mall's opening.
Traffic congestion also could curb some of the expected real estate appreciation.
“We'll look at other sales near the mall after it opens, and decide if it was a result of the mall or just the economy being robust,” Sarasota County Property Appraiser Bill Furst said.
“We're not in a position to predict what's going to happen.”

Sunday, October 19, 2014

Millennials Shunning Malls Speeds Web Shopping Revolution

This story from Bloomberg was noticed by David Brain of New College on the page entitled 2050 Comprehensive Plan sor Sarasota Citizens.
By Matt Townsend Jun 25, 2014 9:42 AM ET

Facebook




CJ Chu is a retailer’s nightmare.

The 24-year-old associate for a private-equity firm does “99 percent” of his shopping online -- even toothpaste. He’d rather buy groceries on the Web than walk to the supermarket.

“Convenience and free time is something I value,” said Chu, who works for Bridge Growth Partners LLC in New York. “Ordering online just makes more sense.”

Chu is an extreme case. Yet millions of Americans like him are abandoning stores faster than executives predicted, pushing the industry to a precipice. Traditional retailers, for the first time ever in 2014, will generate half their sales growth on the Web, according to Stifel Financial Corp. That means about $18 billion in new revenue generated this year will come from online purchases, an analysis of U.S. Census data shows.

The stampede online will only accelerate as 80 million U.S. millennials start families, buying homes and filling them with stuff. Mobile shopping is giving e-commerce another boost. Next month, Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN) will start selling a smartphone that will allow shoppers to scan a product in a mall and purchase it from the company’s online store, giving retailers another reason to fear their most potent Web rival.